User Tools

Site Tools



This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

partnerships:articles:oip1 [2017/06/12 10:20] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +Addressing organisational needs in the 'third sector'​
 + [Mike Powell](mailto:​,​ wrote this article in 1997.\
 +Sheffield'​s [Open Information Project](http://​​)
 +doesn'​t claim to be a community network. Its aim is establish an
 +electronic information network which will be cheap, easy to use and of
 +direct benefit to the work of "third sector"​ - voluntary and social
 +economy - organisations in Sheffield.
 +From the start the project has set out to meet the defined needs of
 +participating organisations. One need has come from changes in the
 +nature and sources of funds for work in the voluntary and social economy
 +sector in recent years. These have multiplied in recent years but their
 +nature has also changed.\
 + They are often less transparent and accountable in their decision
 +making, more focused on short term output rather than institutional
 +development and may require the development of new partnerships - local
 +or transnational - as a condition of funding.\
 + Such demands increase the importance of regular access to up to date
 +information but also - because funds for core staff are cut - lessen
 +organisational capacity to get that information through traditional
 +means such as attending conferences and meetings.\
 + ​Organisations need rapid access to information about funding sources
 +and the ability to share experience and ideas in order to make
 +appropriate responses.\
 + ​Although Sheffield does have a number of high quality paper based
 +directories and newsletters there are a number of reasons why it was
 +felt appropriate to develop an electronic network.
 +-   The electronic network can be complementary to paper provision -
 +    allowing existing information providers to develop their own
 +    services.
 +-   ​Technology now allows such a network to be developed with a
 +    manageable amount of extra work for participating organisations and
 +    a minimum of ongoing central costs.
 +-   It is better for organisations in the sector to determine their own
 +    plans for organising and presenting their information electronically
 +    than waiting to be fitted in to someone else's system.
 +Development of the project
 +Previous efforts to create electronic information systems in Sheffield
 +suffered for lack of high level supporters or from being so technically
 +led that others had difficulty in comprehending let alone following.\
 + Open Information Project, by contrast, grew out of the experience of
 +one organisation,​ Sheffield Co-operative Development Group (SCDG), of
 +the difficulty of keeping up to date with all the potential changes
 +affecting its area of work. Discussions with other organisations showed
 +that this was a common feeling and this shared with a belief that there
 +should be technology available to help us led to the start of this
 +project. The first step was to send a questionairre to organisations in
 +the sector. Of some forty positive responses:-
 +-   ​Nearly all thought their organisation would benefit from quicker
 +    access to relevant information and from sharing information with
 +    other organisations.
 +-   Over half thought the project would save time and cut costs.
 +-   Over half thought it important to have a say in how this technology
 +    is developed and used locally.
 +-   All bar one had computers, only one had a modem
 +SCDG appointed its development worker Mike Powell, to work on the
 +project. His job has been to develop options which have then been
 +discussed at a series of five seminars, attended on average by
 +representatives from ten different participating organisations,​ each of
 +which have guided the next stage of the project.\
 + The project has been funded by the European Regional Development Fund
 +and also received repeated help, both officially and voluntarily from
 +staff, from the University of Sheffield and from Sheffield Hallam
 +### Key discussions have included
 +-   The choice of the World Wide Web as the physical base for the
 +    project. This has meant that participation in the project provides
 +    organisations with training and capacity which goes far beyond the
 +    limits of our own network - in particular it opens the potential for
 +    participants to network with national or international levels of
 +    their own organisations or areas of work. It also makes the
 +    information posted more accessible to the public.
 +-   The decision to seek FTP access for each participant which both
 +    allows and requires each organisation to take responsibility for its
 +    own on-line information. This choice greatly reduces the central
 +    revenue costs for this network compared to most previous ones.
 +-   The decision to place all OIP information on one directory which
 +    will allow the project to run its own classification and index
 +    systems. These have been selected and developed by David Miller of
 +    the Department of Information Studies of the University of Sheffield
 +    with the aim of making the information put on the network as
 +    accessible as possible to non-computer regulars. How to achieve this
 +    aim has been the most discussed subject in the project'​s
 +    development.
 +The existence of the project on one directory will make it possible to
 +download all the information contained to other systems, such as those
 +operated by the local libraries and possibly cable television, which do
 +not offer external Internet access. Training sessions introducing the
 +World Wide Web and teaching basic HTML have also played a vital part in
 +raising awareness and skills.
 +The present
 +The project went on line in April 1996. This represents only one stage
 +in its development. During early months only eleven of the project'​s
 +members have put their pages up. More are likely to follow very soon but
 +it is expected that it will take many months for the information posted
 +to gradually build up into a useful resource.\
 + It is also taking time to develop the communications potential of the
 +project which is probably its most important single element. Early ideas
 +to use Newsgroups or On Line Conferencing Software have proved too
 +ambitious. Busy organisations taking their first steps into telematic
 +communication are not going to look for messages in different places.
 +Thus the project is starting with an internal mailing list which will
 +enable members to post messages to the members as a whole.\
 + A third component of the project will involve regular monitoring of
 +network usage and attempts to develop and use appropriate methodology to
 +evaluate the impact the network has on the sector.\
 + The most important sign of progress is however in the project itself.
 +Twenty five organisations participated in the early stages of the
 +project and are receiving grants to help cover their modem and service
 +provider costs. A further nine have joined the association of local, not
 +for profit organisations which the Open Information Project has become.
 +Many others are associate members or have asked to be kept on the
 +project mailing list and the last progress meeting was the best attended
 +of all. The lead role taken by SCDG has been subsumed by a
 +democratically based steering committee.\
 + The Open Information Project has met all its official targets but it is
 +far too early to call it a success. The level of participation of its
 +members does however offer encouragement both for the sustainability of
 +the existing project and for its further development.\
 + [Open Information Project](http://​​) Web site
partnerships/articles/oip1.txt ยท Last modified: 2017/06/12 10:20 (external edit)